Monday, November 23, 2009

Murder, British style...

Murderer Jane Andrews absconds from prison
Jane Andrews, the former aide to Sarah, Duchess of York who was jailed for life for murdering her boyfriend, is on the run after absconding from East Sutton Park open prison in Maidstone, Kent.
She ran off, eh? I guess there was no way to predict such a thing? Open. Prison. For a murderer.

And there's this...
Policeman jailed for 18 years for murder of fiancée
Apparently the good constable told her he was calling off the wedding because he really dug some other chick he had just impregnated. She started crying and, well, who can put up with that?
Then there are the comments of the judge:
"I have some understanding of the position of what you found yourself in. I believe you did not face up to the situation when you should have done."
Some understanding of the position? Which position? Ditching the fiancee three days before the wedding in favor of the ho he knocked up, or wanting to hit a woman five times with a hammer for starting to cry? Judge is a fucking idiot.

Wednesday, November 18, 2009

Wehner on the Palin 'Fuss'

Over at NRO's The Corner, Pete Wehner shares some thoughts on Sarah Palin, half of which I agree with:

(W)hat Palin has revealed about some of her critics is, in the words of my colleague Yuval Levin, "the unfortunate and unattractive propensity of the American cultural elite to treat those who are not deemed part of the elect with condescension and contumely."
A reader responds and addresses the other half.

Monday, November 2, 2009

Monism and Pluralism

When you can't think of anything intelligent to post, it's good to have friends that write smart stuff a guy can link to.

Saturday, October 24, 2009

Hardboiled

There was a time when men knew how to take a punch, handle a gun or a dangerous dame, and wear a good hat the right way.

In the last couple weeks I immersed myself in classic hardboiled fare: reading Dashiell Hammett's The Thin Man, Raymond Chandler's Farewell My Lovely; and watching the original The Narrow Margin and Last Man Standing, the Bruce Willis re-make of Hammett's corpse-littered Red Harvest.

Good stuff, all of it. It was fun to hang out for a while in a world where men don't get facials, women don't get tattoos, and cigarettes don't have filters.

While my noir jag may be fading, adventure in far off lands is coming on strong: I watched Gary Cooper in 'Beau Geste' last night, and 'The Lives of a Bengal Lancer' is on the other side of the disc...

Thursday, October 22, 2009

Andrew Klavan explains how to have sex

(H/T Instapundit)

Friday, October 16, 2009

Hitchcock, Dogs, Celebrities, and Politicians

Supposedly Alfred Hitchcock once denied saying actors were like cattle; his true opinion was that actors should be treated like cattle. I don’t know if Hitchcock ever really expressed either opinion but the latter one, being more intelligent, is the one I’d bet on.

Several weeks ago Frank J. Fleming wrote that politicians should be trained like dogs, strictly following the model laid out by famous 'Dog Whisperer' Cesar Millan. Fleming’s polemic struck a chord with me. Since then, the exploding cesspool of celebrity support for child rapist Roman Polanski has further led me to believe Fleming’s epiphany has wider application. It should not be limited to the political class. I have always loved and respected Hitchcock, but it seems to me Fleming is correct in this case: celebrities’ treatment needs are far more canine than bovine. Society would benefit greatly by training not only politicians, but also celebrities, in the same way we train dogs.

Celebrities, just like dogs and politicians, need to be regularly exercised, and consistently disciplined, in order for them to be useful to human beings. Otherwise, since they don’t think like human beings, their behavior will degenerate to the completely unacceptable. Once it gets to that point, they must be brought up short and - because some dogs, politicians, and celebrities can grow fairly powerful – bringing them up short can be an unpleasant affair. For instance, if a mastiff is allowed to grow up unruly, and then one day it attempts to jump at an infant, a human must do whatever is necessary to protect the infant, regardless of any harm that may have to be done to the dog. In such a case the dog may feel ill-treated (if dogs - or politicians or celebrities - can be said to ‘feel’ in the same way humans do) but that’s too damn bad. Just because a dog was never trained properly is no reason to let it hurt a human. Better by far of course to train the beast from puppyhood and thereby avoid the necessity of a Dr. Watson/Hound of the Baskervilles finale.

As to celebrities in particular, if Roman Polanski had been properly trained, he might never have raped that child when he was in his 40’s. Likewise, had Polanski been properly disciplined right on the spot, other celebrities in the pack might not have stupidly concluded that what he did wasn’t wrong. Waiting 30 years to discipline Polanski confused the celebrities, just as it would confuse your cocker spaniel if you slapped it on the snout today for crapping in your living room last week. Dogs, politicians, and celebrities need instant feedback or they cannot learn.

Now we have a big mess on our hands. Celebrities are running around defending child rapists, and their more limited intelligence cannot figure out what’s wrong. This is all due to bad training methodology on our part. It’s almost certain that some members of the current celebrity pack are beyond help and should be turned over to Michael Vick for disposition. It also seems clear to me that future celebrities will need a far more consistent discipline if there is to be any chance – even a slim one – of salvaging the breed at all.

Dennis Miller on Roman Polanski's Defenders

"If you feel you've got something so wise, so precious, so singularly sagacious, that you want to tag it onto Polanski's atrocity to "shed some light on it," light is in fact your biggest problem because you've got your head shoved so far up your tuchus that they're gonna have to cut in switchback trails to get to it."
Just so.
(H/T Big Hollywood)

Friday, October 9, 2009

Decline Is a Choice

Charles Krauthammer: "Nothing is inevitable. Nothing is written. For America today, decline is not a condition. Decline is a choice."
(H/T Powerline)

Barrack Obama Elected Pope!

Just kidding of course. He only won the Nobel Peace Prize.

It seems 2009 - I mean the entire frick'n year - has now officially jumped the shark.

Wednesday, October 7, 2009

Movie Review: "Easy Virtue"

Watched Easy Virtue last night. Neither my daughter nor wife would admit to putting it in the Blockbuster queue. I gave it half a star.

According to the movie's marketing folks: “A glamorous American woman enters into a spirited battle of wits with her disapproving English mother-in-law in this period romantic comedy.”

Well, that’s one way of putting it.

SPOILERS ALERT:

Here’s another way to look at it: In modern Anglo-American cinema, if it seems at first that the father of a household is the only reasonable member, the audience is being set up. It took less than 15 minutes to realize Dad and Daughter-in-Law would be running away together in the final frame. The only questions were: one, how much would the plot have to strain believability to make this ending seem less depraved to the audience than it should; and, two, how many clichéd cheap-shots could be aimed at English aristocracy before the fade-out. The answer to the second question is, quite a lot of cheap shots, including pretty much all of the usual: stupidity, blood-thirstiness, sexual repression, blah, blah, blah, you could write the list yourself.

The first question is a bit tougher: how do you run off with your husband’s father without seeming to be the skank you in fact must be? This question is indeed so much tougher the movie doesn’t bother to try to answer it. It settles for the ‘why-don’t-we-just-agree-we’re-different?’ scene between the young husband and wife, and a truly laughable (not to be confused with 'funny') ‘final-straw’ scene between the older couple.

The term “easy virtue” is a somewhat archaic way of referring to women who were, in the opinion of society, quicker than they should be in allowing themselves to be bent over a piece of furniture. It’s possible the makers of this execrable film intend the title to apply to the sensibilities of the audience as well.

French gay soccer team snubbed by Muslim team

Hard for a sophisticate to know sometimes who he should be reviling more, the homophobic Muslims, or the islamaphobic homos? Modern living is so complicated.
(H/T Mark Steyn at NRO)

Friday, October 2, 2009

Kashmiri Girl Power

"An Indian farmer’s daughter disarmed a terrorist leader who broke into her home, attacked him with an axe and shot him dead with his own gun."
Between the stray dogs and the middle-school girls, Kashmir is getting to be a dangerous place for Paki terrorists. The will of Allah is inscrutable.

UPDATE: Apparently she's 21 years old so she's not in middle-school (and she's too old for Roman Polanski).

Wednesday, September 30, 2009

Book Review: Iroquois Diplomacy on the Early American Frontier

My latest book review at Amazon:
Shannon is much more even-handed than we have come to expect in histories involving Native American interaction with whites. The Iroquois are not always the good guys in this telling, as indeed they were not always the good guys in fact.

Tuesday, September 29, 2009

Why can't I think of lines like this?

"There is usually only a limited amount of damage that can be done by dull or stupid people. For creating a truly monumental disaster, you need people with high IQs."

Monday, September 28, 2009

The Verdict on Honduras

"The Law Library of the Congress of the United States (LLC) has issued an opinion on the removal and expulsion of Manuel Zelaya as president of Honduras. The LLC’s conclusion: Zelaya’s removal was legal but his deportation from the country was not."
This is not a shock. There has been mention in the press (not enough, to be sure) that Honduras government seemed to have acted mostly legally in Zelaya's removal. What could possibly have possessed the Obama administration to publicly and strongly support a crazy man, legally removed from office?

Update: LLC Report in PDf:
(H/T Washington Examiner)
The Constitution no longer authorizes impeachment, but gives Congress the power to disapprove of the conduct of the President, to conduct special investigations on issues of national interest, and to interpret the Constitution. In the case against President Zelaya, the National Congress interpreted the power to disapprove of the conduct of the President to encompass the power to remove him from office, based on the results of a special, extensive investigation.

Friday, September 25, 2009

French 'cowboy up', U.S. sings Kumbaya

I bow to no man in general bigoted contempt of the French but, when even they're suggesting we're pussies, some self-evaluation might be called for.

Oddly, I didn't see this report in the U.S. press. (Kidding. There's nothing odd about the U.S. press ignoring this.)

From the Telegraph:
Nicolas Sarkozy, the French president, came close to mocking his American counterpart for the good intentions, which Mr Obama had heralded as an "historic" step towards nuclear abolition, even though it set no specific targets or fresh mandates.

"We live in a real world not a virtual world," the Frenchman told the 15-member council. "And the real world expects us to take decisions.

"President Obama dreams of a world without weapons ... but right in front of us two countries are doing the exact opposite.

"Iran since 2005 has flouted five security council resolutions. North Korea has been defying council resolutions since 1993.

"I support the extended hand of the Americans, but what good has proposals for dialogue brought the international community? More uranium enrichment and declarations by the leaders of Iran to wipe a UN member state off the map," he continued, referring to Israel.

The sharp-tongued French leader even implied that Mr Obama's resolution 1887 had used up valuable diplomatic energy.

"If we have courage to impose sanctions together it will lend viability to our commitment to reduce our own weapons and to making a world without nuke weapons," he said.

Mr Sarkozy has previously called the US president's disarmament crusade "naïve".

(H/T: Maura Flynn

Iran's Nukes (the ones they aren't making anymore)

In November of 2007, the U.S. National Intelligence Community judged with "high confidence" both that "Tehran halted its nuclear weapons program (in 2003)" and "that the halt lasted at least several years." Now it turns out that during the transition between the Bush and Obama administrations (in late 2008) the incoming president was briefed about Iran's covert nuclear facility that is causing all the fuss today.

The 2007 NIE report essentially made it politically impossible for the Bush administration to aggressively confront Iran. After all, our own intelligence community was stating Iran had stopped developing nukes. But one year after issuing such a dramatic, policy-impacting report, the same intelligence community briefs the new administration that it possesses knowledge of Iranian covert nuclear facilities.

Is it just me or is there something very wrong with this picture? Just like in the Valarie Plame "scandal" it seems to me that instead of believing the Bush administration was "politicizing" intelligence, there is reason to wonder whether anti-administration actors within the intelligence community were themselves issuing politically-minded intelligence reports?

You can read the 2007 NIE here.

Honduras Update: You can't make this stuff up

"Honduras' fallen leader told The Miami Herald he is being subjected to mind-altering gas and radiation -- and that `Israeli mercenaries' are planning to assassinate him."
Well, sure. Mind-altering gas. Israeli mercenaries. Of course

So, not only has the U.S. government backed a guy that was lawfully impeached and deposed by the entire legislative, judicial, and military arms of a democracy for blatant attempts to become a dictator, but it also turns out that he's, well, nuts.

And people were worried about Sarah Palin making foreign policy mistakes?

(H/T: Powerline)

Thursday, September 24, 2009

Spot the problem...

Headline:
Criminally insane killer disappears from B.C. psych hospital

Paragraph 1:
"A man convicted of two murders in northeastern B.C. has disappeared from a psychiatric unit(.)"

Paragraph 3:
"(He) left the Forensic Psychiatric Hospital ...with authorization but has not returned." (emphasis added)

So who's crazier, the homicidal maniac, or the retarded idiots in charge of keeping homicidal maniacs off the streets?

'Witchcraft' killers of albino boy to be hanged

The only part of this story that isn't a weird, pathetic indictment of human nature and ignorance is the 'hanging' part, which is good.